User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Arlys Feb 11, 2022
very poor quality, the writer did not respect the time frame to complete the paper and paper instructions. it was supposed to be 2 pages and only completed 1 page.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Franck N. Feb 11, 2022
didn't write everything i asked for.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Sophie S. Feb 11, 2022
did not write the topic i want him to, he decided for himself which is not acceptable
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ana Feb 11, 2022
The writer was trying to take up space by constantly writing out the full name of acrynyms, stating the same basic obvious things in more than one sentence, lack of proper capitalization and grammar, missuse of tenses. the writer gave 4-5 revisions and still could not get it correct or satisfy me.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Emeral Feb 11, 2022
Misunderstood the assignment, but had excellent communication skills.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Carla L. Feb 11, 2022
Spelling errors were prominent throughout the essay. I had to go through and correct them myself. Ideas were on par with level required.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Martina Feb 11, 2022
No real effort by the writer, pretty much a cut and paste job and writer had no idea what a programming TOE chart looks like,. I sked the writer to revise the paper and add a diagram and only noticed a few words changed.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Steph F. Feb 10, 2022
he is the worst person i have ever made business with.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Jufeng L. Feb 10, 2022
It was okay. Not great.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ken R. Feb 10, 2022
Paper came to late to submit poor communication
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)