User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Eric Jun 29, 2021
Poor and not did what I asked
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Quintina Jun 29, 2021
was completed way pass dead line and no communication because of why
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Kristy Jun 29, 2021
responsive and listens to client
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Nirmal Jun 29, 2021
He is good but you have to keep up with him too much
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Tony C. Jun 29, 2021
failed to complete the assignment or tell me earlier
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Samantha Jun 29, 2021
Why hasn\'t I used this service before? Then, I could avoid so many low grades. Thank you for your help!
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Sammy Jun 29, 2021
Original paper as always! Thanks!
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Gilbert Jun 29, 2021
I found 5 to 6 errors in spelling, overall the writing itself is good.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Tyrone Jun 29, 2021
the author did not analyze both of the companies that the paper had to be on. instead focused on one company. there was spelling errors and some of the sentence seemed like there were just thrown together. I am now going to resubmit it for revising. Ensure you make it clear what the paper is on.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Joe L. Jun 29, 2021
Only got 58/100, here is the feedback from TA.Mastery. (28/40) Clarity, care, and detail. (20/40) Writing. (10/20) Mastery: What do you mean by Popper's attempt is 'full of skepticism'. Also not sure where the notion of falsification is discussed - 'extrapolating experiences to other conditions' seems like induction. Clarity: Lots of unnecessary detail in here that dilute your argument - for instance, causation discussion not needed.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)