User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Garry P. Jul 29, 2025
First time trying this and not sure it was done according to my instructions, I have to answer this before I
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mohammadreza H. Jul 28, 2025
Instructions were not followed well. Took longer than anticipated, however completed on time.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Govanni M. Jul 28, 2025
I got C - of the essay he wrote for me. Poor word choice. Awkward wording.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Hu Jul 28, 2025
The arresting descriptions written by your writing team were miraculously accurate.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Vi Jul 28, 2025
This paper is totally confusing, lots of mistakes and the aim and objectives are missing and the research of the paper is useless
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Marisol Jul 28, 2025
This person exercised a fraudulent behaviour to receive money from me. He did not do the requested task. However, the work he claimed he has done was totally unrelated to the topic, leaving me with very little time before deadline and without completed project. Unprofessional, unreliable, incompetent and impolite.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Patrick M. Jul 28, 2025
A few mishaps that should've been avoided caused my assignment to be late. The writer has a lot of backchat when it comes to her mistakes.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Caitlyn Jul 28, 2025
Many grammatical errors and run-ons.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mujahid A. Jul 27, 2025
Writer did not complete order in time ...
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Valeriya A. Jul 27, 2025
The work did not contain sufficient level of legal analysis and tends to be general in its commentary.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)