User reviews

Jay T. Apr 28, 2026

Did not read the instructions and didn't do it right

Suzy W. Apr 28, 2026

Poor quality and instruction not followed

Michael Apr 28, 2026

Half of the information provided were from 2019, as this was an update for 2020 Q1, which didnt help, as most of the information the writer provided were already mentioned in 2019 Q4 reports, which looked like i was coping information from previous reports, even though i provided the previous 3 Quarters report for the writer to have a look at, but nothing helped, even the title was copied as july 2019 !!!!!,

Yongjun A. Apr 28, 2026

Horrible writing, super late for a 2 page paper that only summarized an article even though was given more than 2 weeks. DO NOT REQUEST.

Tomas J. Apr 27, 2026

The writer was unable to do my paper and it was already a short deadline and Wasted my time

Mwamini Apr 27, 2026

The language did not connect with the family structure theory. I received an 11 out of 20 points, bringing my grade down significantly. Very disappointed. Not sure that this paper was reviewed as your advertisement states.

Joy Apr 27, 2026

Only gave two star because he wrote something, however very poorly done. Cannot be used at all, lack of content, poor communication, no knowledge of topic. Promised to fix it, waited but no response. I doubt writer is capable of a redo. Now have to do it myself all over. A waste of resources and time. Never again.

Tim B. Apr 27, 2026

Did not follow instructions and poor quality work.

Yanhong Apr 27, 2026

The depth and detail is not enough. Need to analyze the deeper meaning of the advertisements and relate them to the 2 key terms - the explanations are very superficial and not sociological.

Jason Apr 27, 2026

Content was okay. Removed 5 stars because proper APA format was not followed and specifically stated. Writer verbalized understanding at the time, but the result is not in APA format.